Oh, Those Romantics!

•05/12/10 • 5 Comments

Anyone reading this blog knows my somewhat ardent predilection for anecdote. Those small, oftentimes, unassuming stories that are frequently unreliable, no more than heresay, really, yet reveal much of the temperament and times.

Thus, when I learned of a new book “Young Romantics: The Tangled Lives of English Poetry’s Greatest Generation” that explores the intertwining lives of Shelley, Byron, Keats and their cohorts, detailing fascinating periods like the summer of Frankenstein (another day, another post), and the group’s exploits while Hunt was incarcerated in 1813, I was immediately intrigued. Cambridge scribe and author, Daisy Hay, describes the scholastic tome as “a web of lives, within which friendships fade, allegiances shift, and nothing remains static for very long.”

While culture is generally consumed with itself in the “now,” here is a work that details a 19th-century movable feast of interlinked English poets and thinkers that was every bit as fascinating and combustible as our own.

A sampling:

 

 

At age 22 Shelley insisted on a diet of bread, butter and “a sort of spurious lemonade” until a friend, Thomas Love Peacock, convinced him to start eating meat again. Shelley’s complexion improved at once.

 

 

The writer, John William Polidori, developed a serious crush on 18-year-old Mary Wollstonecraft and in his romantic exuberance “jumped from a wall in an effort to impress her, spraining his ankle badly.” A few days later, in a tearful exchange, the dear girl expressed that most dreaded of sentiments: she thought of him as little more than a brother.

 

 

It is said that the always fascinating Lord Byron enjoyed singing Albanian songs consisting of “strange, wild howls” that reached their most melodic while boating with his pal, Shelley, who engaged in a kind of duel to exacerbate their “contest with the elements.” A curious pastime; I suppose you would have had to have been there.

 

 

The little known, but irascibly popular author and critic, Leigh Hunt, once conferred the nickname of “Junkets,” on that most noble and distinguished of poets, John Keats, a soubriquet Keats hated. “What has become of Junkets?” Hunt wondered aloud one day to Charles Cowden Clarke in the summer of 1817. “I suppose Queen Mab has eaten him,” he mused.

 

 

Upon his release from Surrey Gaol for libel charges, Leigh Hunt, (a handsome fellow, no?) created for himself a new study “which bore a startling resemblance to his prison bower.” His books, busts, flowers and piano (clearly, it was a minimum security establishment) were all carefully transported from his prison cell. “His new room was lily- rather than rose-themed, but in all other respects it was identical to his prison accommodation.” You can take the boy out of the cell block but …

 

 

 

Overheard

•05/11/10 • 7 Comments

 

“Anyone who reads at all diversely during these bizarre 1920s cannot escape the conclusion that a number of crazy men and women are writing stuff which remarkably passes for important composition among certain persons who should know better.

Stuart P. Sherman, however, refused to be numbered among those who stand in awe and admiration of one of the most eminent of the idiots, Gertrude Stein. He reviews her Geography and Plays in the August 11 issue of the Literary Review of the New York Evening Post and arrives at the conviction that it is a marvellous and painstaking achievement in setting down approximately 80,000 words which mean nothing at all.”

James Thurber

 

Gertrude Stein, Alice B. Toklas and their poodle, Basket. France, 1944. Photograph by Carl Mydans. It is said that Stein and Toklas were serious poodle people. Over the years they had three; Basket, Basket I and Basket II. It would seem, Basket is the comeliest of the trio, no?

 

 

RIP: Lena Horne

•05/10/10 • 8 Comments

 

“She was ageless.

… tempered like steel,

baked like clay,

annealed like glass;

life has

chiseled,

burnished,

refined her.”

John Simon

 

Lena Horne, 92, Manhatten

 

Signatures:
Stormy Weather
The Man I Love

 

 

Cartier-Bresson: Continued

•05/09/10 • 2 Comments

 

“Photography
is not
documentary,
but
intuition,
a
poetic
experience.”

 

 

“It’s
drowning
yourself,
dissolving
yourself,
and then
sniff, sniff, sniff –
being
sensitive
to
coincidence.”

 

 

“You can’t
go looking
for it;
you can’t
want it,
or you
won’t
get it.”

 

 

“First
you must
lose
yourself.
Then
it
happens.”

~Henry Cartier Bresson

 

The Early Years.

 

One of the most groundbreaking advances in photography happened between two world wars with the introduction of hand-held cameras. Suddenly, a photographer could be on the move recording the ebb and flow of life as it happened.

 

 

These new cameras didn’t merely fix the motion of the subject; they also freed the photographer from virtually all constraints. One could now reinvent the life of the street as Surrealist theater making it more surprising, mysterious, and compelling than the eye perceived it.

 

 

With a camera in his hand and a few rolls of film in his pocket, Cartier-Bresson never needed to decide if he was working or if he was just living.

 

 

He was doing both.

He was a master,

celebrating action

by freezing it …

 

 

… transforming

the ordinary

into the exceptional.

 

Photos: Henry Cartier Bresson’s Early Years.
Featured: Hyères, France, Belgium, Paris, Marseille, Italy and Poland. 1931 – 1933

 

 

 

Mothers of the Misbegotten

•05/07/10 • 11 Comments

 

The sweetest sounds to mortals given
Are heard in Mother, Home, and Heaven.

~William Goldsmith Brown

 

 

Sunday, May 9, is the day devoted to mothers. Two of whom are being honored here.

Lest you think the above quote by William Goldsmith Brown (who is neither revered, esteemed nor graced with a Wikipedia mention) or the impressionist painting by Henri Le Sidaner (who is most famously remembered in Proust’s A La Recherche du temps perdus as “highly distinguished” but “not great”) as second-rate works that are cloyingly trite and dismally vapid, executed by two paragons of mediocrity throughout the anals of literature and art, consider that each had a mother, who, I am willing to venture a guess, viewed them as creating the finest and most enduring of the world’s greatest masterpieces.

 

Table in Sunlight in the Garden, Henri Le Sidaner

 

 

Cheerful Weather for the Wedding

•05/06/10 • 5 Comments

 

“It is a brisk English March day, and Dolly is getting ready to marry the wrong man. Waylaid by the sulking admirer who lost his chance, an astonishingly oblivious mother bustling around and making a fuss, and her own sinking dread, the bride-to-be struggles to reach the altar.

Dolly knew, as she looked round at the long wedding-veil stretching away forever, and at the women, too, so busy all around her, that something remarkable and upsetting in her life was steadily going forward.”

 

Julia Strachey, Lytton Strachey’s niece, wrote two pieces of fiction in her lifetime. Cheerful Weather for the Wedding appeared in 1932. The action, such as it is, takes place on March 5, in the home of Dolly Thatcham, whose wedding day it is. The narrator is omniscient, but prefers to lurk in the corner of a room, minutely observing the behavior of the bride, her family, and their guests.

Not, one guesses, a happy marriage in the making.

Dolly is privately nursing a bottle of rum while Joseph, a family friend, lingers on the edge of tears all day. Alas, he isn’t the groom, but a tongue-tied former suitor who always thought Dolly must know he loved her.

The portrait of Mrs. Thatcham is especially pitiless, as she trots around resolutely promoting the facade of propriety necessary to the day.

Most striking is Strachey’s technique of watching her characters’ minute behavior avidly, without commenting:

 

“The strange thing
was the way
the eyes kept ceaselessly roaming,
shifting, ranging,
round and round the room.
Round and round again…
this looked queer–the face
so passive and remote seeming,
the eyes so restless.”

 

That’s the bride she’s describing. The effect is discomfiting, as is the whole novella.

 

 

 

This is one of those lovely books published by Persephone, a UK imprint that turns out beautiful paper-bound editions with the loveliest cover art, printed endpapers, and what I believe are called “French flaps,” where the cover folds over to give you a flap for copy. They’re always beautiful and readable; mostly women writers.

I would suggest ordering through Persephone for a copy to cherish, although for the impatient, it is available through Amazon, as well.

 

“A brilliant,
bittersweet
upstairs-downstairs
comedy.”

The Guardian

 

 

Endpapers: 1932 design for a printed dress fabric by Madeleine Lawrence.

 

 

Fashion. Feminism. Forgotten.

•05/05/10 • 9 Comments

 

American Woman: Fashioning a National Identity

May 5 – August 15
Metropolitan Museum
Fifth Ave. at 82nd St., New York, N.Y.
212-535-7710
metmuseum.org

 

The exhibit, opening today, explores developing views of the modern American woman from the 50-year period of 1890 to 1940 and how they shaped the way people see American women today. It focuses on the types of American femininity that mirrored women’s social, political and sexual emancipation.

Organized around six American “identities”—the heiress, the Gibson Girl, the bohemian, the suffragette and the patriot, the flapper, and the screen siren, there is, ironically, one striking omission — the working-class girl, the one who has fought for her place in the social strata rather than inheriting or marrying it.

Which are you?

 

UPDATE: Just learned that my fellow blogger, Bart Boehlert, of BB’s Beautiful Things, took viewers on a tour of the exhibit that you won’t want to miss. He even managed to snatch a few moments with famed editor, Anna Wintour. See it here.

 

Illustration:
J. C. Leyendecker (American, 1874–1951)
Courtesy Archives of American Illustrators Gallery NYC and National Museum of American Illustration, Newport RI
Cover for Collier’s magazine, 1907 Oil on canvas