The BOND Classic Martini

Synonymous with sophistication, allure, and delicious decadence, the martini holds a hallowed place in social history – it is the “KING OF COCKTAILS.” Like the stiletto heel, it never goes out of style. Entire bar menus are devoted to its variants and a hip, retro cultural movement has adopted the martini as its cornerstone for stylish fun.The martini remains on the cutting edge of liquid fashion, constantly reinventing itself. There is no other world-traveler like the martini. Never watered down, the martini stands strong and silent in every language with no translation needed.
For the true tini afficiando, be sure to archive Bond Lover’s Memorable Martinis. You’ll be channeling 007 in no time.
Special thanks to the KingofCocktails.com
CLASSIC DRY MARTINI
Ingredients
- 4 parts Vodka
- 3 to 5 drops Dry vermouth
- 1/8 tsp Lemon juice
- Lemon twist
Mixing Instructions
Combine liquid ingredients in a cocktail shaker with cracked ice and shake well. Strain into a chilled martini glass. Garnish with lemon twist.
Variations of this Cocktail
More or less vermouth
Also known as
Extra Dry Martini
Origin and History of the Dry Martini
As old as time.
Modifications to the Dry Martini
Vesper
Bradford
No one in history has done more for the martini and its distinctive reputation than the fictional character who put the man back into manhood, Ian Fleming’s James Bond. If you really want to win friends and influence just about everyone in your very selective and choicest of circles, we’ve compiled some fascinating data about Mr. Bond and his martini habits, settling the record straight once and for all regarding “Shaken not Stirred” and Gin or Vodka. Time you stepped up to be the life of the party!
The shaken Martini is first presented to Bond in the first Bond film Dr. No in 1962, but Bond did not order one himself until Goldfinger (1964). Since then, each Bond has himself ordered the drink, except for two.
Roger Moore’s Bond never ordered one, although he did receive one in the 1977 film The Spy Who Loved Me. Daniel Craig’s Bond (who has only starred in Casino Royale as of 2006) has not yet ordered the drink. In Casino Royale, when the barman asks whether he would like a martini shaken or stirred, the younger and less experienced Bond snaps, “Do I look like I give a damn?”
Bond first ordered a drink to be shaken in Fleming’s novel Casino Royale (1953) when he requested a drink of his own invention which would later be referred to as a “Vesper“, named after the Bond girl, Vesper Lynd. After just meeting his CIA contact Felix Leiter for the first time, Bond orders the drink from a barman while at the casino.
‘A dry martini,’ he said. ‘One. In a deep champagne goblet.’
‘Oui, monsieur.’
‘Just a moment. Three measures of Gordon’s, one of vodka, half a measure of Kina Lillet. Shake it very well until it’s ice-cold, then add a large thin slice of lemon peel. Got it?’
‘Certainly monsieur.’ The barman seemed pleased with the idea.
‘Gosh, that’s certainly a drink,’ said Leiter.
Bond laughed. ‘When I’m…er…concentrating,’ he explained, ‘I never have more than one drink before dinner. But I do like that one to be large and very strong and very cold, and very well-made. I hate small portions of anything, particularly when they taste bad. This drink’s my own invention. I’m going to patent it when I think of a good name.’
— Casino Royale, Chapter 7: Rouge et Noir[5]
Following the novel’s lead, the Vesper was prominenty featured in the 2006 film version of Casino Royale.
A Vesper differs from Bond’s usual cocktail of choice, the martini, in that it uses both gin and vodka, Kina Lillet instead of vermouth, and a lemon peel instead of an olive. In the same scene Bond gives more details about the Vesper telling the same barman that vodka made from grain instead of potatoes makes the drink even better. Russian and Polish vodkas were also always preferred by Bond if they were in stock. Although there is a lot of discussion on the Vesper, it is only ordered once throughout Fleming’s novels and by later books Bond is ordering regular vodka martinis, though he also drinks regular gin martinis. In total Bond orders 19 vodka martinis and 16 gin martinis throughout Fleming’s novels and short stories.
Why shaken, not stirred?
Scientists, specifically biochemists, and martini connoisseurs have investigated the difference between a martini shaken and a martini stirred. According to a study at the Department of Biochemistry at the University of Western Ontario in Canada to determine if the preparation of a martini has an influence on their antioxidant capacity, the shaken gin martinis were able to break down hydrogen peroxide and leave only 0.072% of the peroxide behind, versus the stirred gin martini which left behind 0.157% of the peroxide. The study was done at the time because moderate consumption of alcohol appears to reduce the risk of cataracts, cardiovascular disease, and stroke, none of which afflict the fictional James Bond.
Andrew Lycett, an Ian Fleming biographer, believed that Fleming liked his martinis shaken, not stirred because Fleming thought that stirring a drink diminished its flavour. Lycett also noted that Fleming preferred gin and vermouth for his martini. It has also been said that Fleming was a fan of martinis shaken by Hans Schröder, a German bartender.
Some connoisseurs believe that shaking gin is a faux pas, supposedly because the shaking “bruises” the gin (a term referring to a slight bitter taste that can allegedly occur when gin or vodka is shaken). Others contend that Bond was only shaking because of the vodka it contained. Prior to the 1960s, vodka was, for the most part, refined from potatoes (usually cheaper brands). This element made the vodka oily. To disperse the oil, Bond ordered his martinis shaken; thus, in the same scene where he orders the martini, he tells the barman about how vodka made from grain rather than potatoes makes his drink even better. This does not explain why Bond in the films still preferred his drink to be shaken rather than stirred, because beginning mostly in the 1960s vodka refined from potatoes was virtually replaced by vodka refined by grains such as corn and wheat or by other ingredients such as grapes and soybeans.
Other reasons for shaking tend to include making the drink colder or as Bond called it, ice-cold. Shaking allows the drink to couple with the ice longer thus making it far colder than if it were to be stirred. Shaking is also said to dissolve the vermouth better making it less oily tasting.
While properly called a Bradford, shaken martinis also appear cloudier than when stirred. This is caused by the small fragments of ice present in a shaken martini.
Now aren’t you glad you asked?






















































































































































[...] Russian Decadence Bond Could Love If James Bond were to swagger into Harvey Nichol’s newly refurbished Fifth Floor Bar he may find himself both shaken and stirred. To celebrate its fifteenth year of utter fabulousness, the bar has teamed up with Russian Vodka brand Stolichnaya to create a delicious infusion range, including such delights as the Chocolate & Pepper Martini and the ultra indulgent Cherry Caviar Martini, a world apart from Bond’s favoured tipple. [Check out one of EA’s favorite posts ‘The Classic Bond Martini’ 8/31] [...]
Russian Decadence Bond Could Love « The Errant Æsthete said this on 11/13/07 at 05:11:38 |
Chère Suzanne:
It sounds like Wikipedia is mixing myth and fact in their article on shaking vs. stirring. Shaking and stirring both have two functions: chilling the drink and contributing some water (in the form of melted ice) to it. That’s why you shouldn’t use freezer vodka for cocktails (or at least not too much of it). The water subtly (that’s why you always want to use clean ice) “opens up” and changes the flavor of the liquor in whatever cocktail you’re making. The real difference from the two techniques is the cloudiness of the final product. A stirred Martini will be crystal clear, while a shaken one is cloudy when poured, but will gradually clear up. It’s all a matter or aesthetics (of which I’m sure you will approve). The cloudiness is not caused by ice crystals, but by the tiny air bubbles introduced into the drink during shaking. Aesthetics is why today’s craft mixologists say you should stir clear cocktails (like Martinis) and shake the rest (i.e. those containing cloudy fruit juices, like the lime juice in Margaritas). How much the flavor changes during shaking and stirring depends on two things: how much the temperature of the drink is lowered and how much of the ice melts. These two are obviously closely related. You must stir longer to get the same effects that you can get from less time spent shaking, but you can still get the same end result (chilling & dilution) from stirring. On the other hand, one of the best Vodka Martinis I ever had was made with Grey Goose (possibly pre-chilled) and so well shaken that felt like it had thousands of tiny crystals of ice in it. Formidable! Un vrai amuse-bouche. It was so good that I shook my Martinis for quite a while after that. Ice crystals: advantage shaking. Clarity: advantage stirring. Taste: a tie (if you do them both right).
BTW, I love your blog. The images are great and the writing is even better; I knew I was in for a treat when I encountered Marcel’s portrait as I scrolled through. I’m looking forward to reading more, and I have passed the address on to my family and friends and my followers on Twitter. But all this writing is making me thirsty. Perhaps it’s time to kick back and try a Vesper…
À bientôt,
The Utah Mixologist
Dearest Monsieur,
I am thrilled with your contribution to this most essential of rituals — the stirring and or shaking of the indomitable martini. So impassioned am I by your comment, I am thinking of creating a post in its honor to elucidate this most baffling of dilemmas. You have my complete gratitude for adding to the richness of the discussion.
And thank you for your most kind words on my blog, uneven though it has been these last weeks due to errant demands. I soundly agree to your suggestion of “kicking back” with a Vesper close at hand. Shall we go for clarity, ice crystals or taste?